Shield) in lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required hinein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met in forward facing CRSs with restraining https://corbett-houmann.federatedjournals.com/the-single-best-strategy-to-use-for-federal-motor-vehicle-safety-standard-seat-belt-webbing